Advances in breast imaging: a review on where we are and where we are going

Authors

Keywords:

breast, breast neoplasms, early cancer detection, breast ultrasonography, mammography, magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Breast radiology has undergone significant advances in recent years, and, naturally, several possibilities open up for attending physicians. Concomitantly, it increases the responsibility to keep up to date and provide the best care for each patient. Aware of the complex implications that the implementation of some of the technological advances may bring, such as increased costs, limited availability of equipment, and a potential increase in examination time, the objective of this study is to carry out a narrative review and provide a collection of advances that, in our opinion, are already gaining ground and should be consolidated in clinical practice. We will discuss new breast imaging methods that can be used both for screening and for the diagnostic investigation of breast lesions and we will summarize the most relevant aspects of each of them, addressing the technique, applicability, positive aspects, and limitations of each modality in a standardized way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nicosia L, Gnocchi G, Gorini I, Venturini M, Fontana F, Pesapane F, et al. History of mammography: analysis of breast imaging diagnostic achievements over the last century. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(11):1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111596

Løberg M, Lousdal ML, Bretthauer M, Kalager M. Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z

Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen THH, Yen AMF, Cohen A, Tot T, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011;260(3):658-63. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110469

Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI. Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art. Radiology. 2021;299(1):36-48. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021201948

Coffey K, Jochelson MS. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening. Eur J Radiol. 2022;156:110513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110513

Lobbes MB, Lalji U, Houwers J, Nijssen EC, Nelemans PJ, van Roozendaal L, et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1668-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3154-5

Gelardi F, Ragaini E, Sollini M, Bernardi D, Chiti A. Contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(8):1890. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081890

Kornecki A. Current status of contrast enhanced mammography: a comprehensive review. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022;73(1):141-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211029047

Chong A, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES, Conant EF. Digital breast tomosynthesis: concepts and clinical practice. Radiology. 2019;292(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019180760

Shahan CL, Layne GP. Advances in breast imaging with current screening recommendations and controversies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2022;49(1):1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2021.11.001

Kulkarni S, Freitas V, Muradali D. Digital breast tomosynthesis: potential benefits in routine clinical practice. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022;73(1):107-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211025229

Conant EF, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Herschorn SD, Weaver DL, Onega T, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;156(1):109-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3695-1

Whitman GJ, Scoggins ME. screening breast ultrasound following tomosynthesis. Acad Radiol. 2022;29(3):348-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.003

Caumo F, Romanucci G, Hunter K, Zorzi M, Brunelli S, Macaskill P, et al. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(2):391-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4756-4

Skaane P, Sebuødegård S, Bandos AI, Gur D, Østerås BH, Gullien R, et al. Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169(3):489-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4705-2

Bicchierai G, Di Naro F, De Benedetto D, Cozzi D, Pradella S, Miele V, et al. A review of breast imaging for timely diagnosis of disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115509

Spear GG, Mendelson EB. Automated breast ultrasound: supplemental screening for average-risk women with dense breasts. Clin Imaging. 2020;76:15-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.12.007

Mann RM, Hooley R, Barr RG, Moy L. Novel approaches to screening for breast cancer. Radiology. 2020;297(2):266-85. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200172

Feig SA. Prospects for the use of automated whole breast ultrasound: in planning and monitoring breast cancer treatment. Breast J. 2021;27(2):111-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14181

Wojcinski S, Gyapong S, Farrokh A, Soergel P, Hillemanns P, Degenhardt F. Diagnostic performance and interobserver concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS). BMC Med Imaging. 2013;13:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-13-36

Camargo Junior HSA. Ultrassonografia automatizada: a que veio e para que serve? Rev Bras Mastologia. 2016;26(4):143-5. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z201600040001RBM.

Bougias H, Stogiannos N. Breast MRI: where are we currently standing? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2022;53(2):203-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.03.072

Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F, Manoukian S, Bergonzi S, Trecate G, et al. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(2):94-105. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f3fcdf

Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(22):2304-10. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5386

Borthakur A, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, Conant EF. Comparison of study activity times for “Full” versus “Fast MRI” for breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(8):1046-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.004

Leithner D, Moy L, Morris EA, Marino MA, Helbich TH, Pinker K. Abbreviated MRI of the breast: does it provide value? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(7):e85-e100. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26291

Hernández ML, Osorio S, Florez K, Ospino A, Díaz GM. Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: a systematic review of literature. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;8:100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100307

Patel S, Heacock L, Gao Y, Elias K, Moy L, Heller S. Advances in abbreviated breast MRI and ultrafast imaging. Semin Roentgenol. 2022;57(2):145-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2022.01.004

Ahmadinejad N, Azhdeh S, Arian A, Eslami B, Mehrabinejad MM. Implementation of abbreviated breast MRI in diagnostic and screening settings. Acta Radiol. 2023;64(3):987-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851221114434

Deo RC. Machine learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920-30. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593

Chan HP, Samala RK, Hadjiiski LM, Zhou C. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1213:3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1

McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H, et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6

Geras KJ, Mann RM, Moy L. Artificial intelligence for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: current concepts and future perspectives. Radiology. 2019;293(2):246-59. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182627

Schaffter T, Buist DSM, Lee CI, Nikulin Y, Ribli D, Guan Y, et al. Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200265. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265

Salim M, Wåhlin E, Dembrower K, Azavedo E, Foukakis T, Liu Y, et al. External evaluation of 3 commercial artificial intelligence algorithms for independent assessment of screening mammograms. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1581-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3321

Downloads

Published

2024-01-12

How to Cite

Coelho, F. M. de O. ., Gontijo, M. F. S. V. ., Loaiza, K. P. C. ., Franco, R. C. S. ., & Avelar, J. T. C. de . (2024). Advances in breast imaging: a review on where we are and where we are going. Mastology, 33. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1092

Issue

Section

Review Articles