Immediate reconstruction with implant post-mastectomy with prepectoral versus submuscular technique: experience of a public oncological treatment center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29289/2594539420240003Keywords:
breast cancer, breast implants, oncoplastyAbstract
Introduction: Reconstruction techniques after mammary adenectomy with implant placement in the prepectoral space without the use of cell dermal matrix have been attracting more interest recently. However, data on the risk of complications, especially in patients treated in Brazil by the Brazilian Unified Health System, are scarce. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study on women who underwent mammary adenectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants in a public hospital in Brazil, with survival analysis for implant extrusion and its associated factors. Results: Prepectoral and submuscular implant-based reconstruction had similar clinical outcomes. High axillary involvement (four or more lymph nodes) was the only factor associated with implant extrusion, regardless of the implant reconstruction techniques used. Conclusions: Tumor burden might interfere with the immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.
Downloads
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Outubro rosa 2022 [cited on 2023 Mar. 29]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/campanhas/2022/outubro-rosa#:~:text=Com%20o%20tema%20%22Eu%20cuido,precoce%20e%20rastreamento%20da%20doen%C3%A7a
3. McDonald E, Clark AS, Tchou J, Zhang P, Freedman GM. Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57 Suppl 1:9S-16S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.157834
4. Frasson A, Novita G, Millen E, Felipe Z, Pimentel F, Brenelli F, et al. Doenças da mama: guia baseado em evidências. 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 2018.
5. Chopra S, Al-Ishaq Z, Vidya R. The journey of prepectoral breast reconstruction through time. World J Plast Surg. 2021;10(2):3-13. https://doi.org/10.29252/wjps.10.2.3
6. Jafferbhoy S, Chandarana M, Houlihan M, Parmeshwar R, Narayanan S, Soumian S, et al. Early multicenter experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon®. Gland Surg. 2017;6(6):682-8. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.07.07
7. Ribuffo D, Berna G, Vita R, Di Benedetto G, Cigna E, Greco M, et al. Dual-plane retro-pectoral versus pre-pectoral dti breast reconstruction: an Italian multicenter experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(1):51-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01892-y
8. Manrique OJ, Huang TC, Martinez-Jorge J, Ciudad P, Forte AJ, Bustos SS, et al. Prepectoral two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: do we see a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):263e-272e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006442
9. Franceschini G, Scardina L, Di Leone A, Terribile DA, Sanchez AM, Magno S, et al. Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: traditional subpectoral technique versus direct-to-implant prepectoral reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix. J Pers Med. 2021;11(2):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020153
10. Urban C, González E, Fornazari A, Berman G, Spautz C, Kuroda F, et al. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without placement of acellular dermal matrix or mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(5):973-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009618
11. Jones G, Antony AK. Single stage, direct to implant pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8(1):53-60. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.10.08
12. Snyderman RK, Guthrie RH. Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;47(6):565-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197106000-00008
13. Schlenker JD, Bueno RA, Ricketson G, Lynch JB. Loss of silicone implants after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;62(6):853-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197812000-00004
14. Franceschini G, Masetti R. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acelular dermal matrix after conservative mastectomy: can a more effective alternative be used in the near future? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(5):1225-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.037
15. Cuomo R. Submuscular and pre-pectoral ADM assisted immediate breast reconstruction: a literature review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(6):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56060256
16. Vita R, Buccheri EM, Villanucci A, Pozzi M. Breast reconstruction actualized in nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant, prepectoral polyurethane positioning: early experience and preliminary results. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(2):e358-e363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2018.12.015
17. Salibian AH, Harness JK, Mowlds DS. Staged suprapectoral expander/implant reconstruction without acelular dermal matrix following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):30-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002845
18. Adam H, Bygdeson M, de Boniface J. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a Swedish matched cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(10):1209-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.07.037
19. Franceschini G, Masetti R. Evidence-based nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with higher body mass index: recommendations for a successful standardized surgery. Am J Surg. 2020;220(2)393-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.002
20. Daar DA, Abdou SA, Rosario L, Rifkin WJ, Santos PJ, Wirth GA, et al. Is there a preferred incision location for nipple-sparing mastectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(5):906e-919e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005502
21. Hassan R, Urban CA, Dória MT, Spautz CC, Rabinovich I, Anselmi KF, et al. Exposed implant after immediate breast reconstruction – presentation and analysis of a clinical management protocol. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021;43(9):690-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735939
22. Sbitany H, Gomez-Sanchez C, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy: an assessment of clinical outcomes and benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):10-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005140
23. Downs RK, Hedges K. An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction – a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(7):e821. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839
24. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2019: offer help to quit tobacco use. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
25. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Data and smoking numbers. Data about prevalence, diseases, mortality, costs, tobacco production and exportation and per capita consumption. Ministério da Saúde; 2022 [cited on 2024 Sept. 4]. Avaliable from: https://www.gov.br/inca/en/topics/health-professional/observatory-of-the-national-policy-on-tobacco-control/data-and-smoking-numbers
26. Mirhaidari SJ, Azouz V, Wagner DS. Prepectoral versus subpectoral direct to implant immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(3):263-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
27. Colwell AS, Gadd M, Smith BL, Austen Jr WG. An inferolateral approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65(2):140-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c1fe77
28. Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, Nahabedian MY, Spear SL. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1043-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48b8a
29. Salibian AH, Harness JK, Mowlds DS. Inframammary approach to nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):700e-708e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4d64f
30. Irwin GW, Black A, Refsum SE, McIntosh SA. Skin-reducing mastectomy and one-stage implant reconstruction with a myodermal flap: a safe and effective technique in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(9):1188-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.048
31. Apte A, Walsh M, Balaji P, Khor B, Chandrasekharan S, Chakravorty A. Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy. Surgeon. 2020;18(4):202-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2019.09.007
32. Khan A, Tasoulis MK, Teoh V, Tanska A, Edmonds R, Gui G. Pre-pectoral one-stage breast reconstruction with anterior biological acellular dermal matrix coverage. Gland Surg. 2021;10(3):1002-9. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-652
33. Safran T, Al-Halabi B, Viezel-Mathieu A, Boileau JF, Dionisopoulos T. Direct-to-implant, prepectoral breast reconstruction: a single-surgeon experience with 201 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(4):686e-696e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006654
34. Elswick SM, Harless CA, Bishop SN, Schleck CD, Mandrekar J, Reusche RD, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004453
35. Blok Y, van Lierop E, Plat VD, Corion LUM, Verduijn PS, Krekel NMA. Implant loss and associated risk factors following implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(7):e3708. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003708
36. Jang JK, Sverdlik ER, Schechter NR. A radiation oncologist’s guide to axillary management in breast cancer: a walk through the trials. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2019;11(4):293-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-019-00330-6
37. Montagna G, Mamtani A, Knezevic A, Brogi E, Barrio AV, Morrow M. Selecting node-positive patients for axillary downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(11):4515-22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08650-z
38. Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Allen G, Sporck M, Parekh M, Macarios D, et al. Assessing postsurgical outcomes with prepectoral breast reconstruction: a literature review and meta-analysis update. 2021;9(10):e3828. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003825
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pedro Lima Costa, Yara Carolina Monte de Sena Rosa, Gláucia Mesquita Cordeiro, Ana Gabriela Caldas Oliveira, Raquel Aranha Viegas, José Pereira Guará
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
