IMPACT OF PREOPERATORY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN ONCOPLASTIC SURGERY

Authors

  • Karina Furlan Anselmi Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Cicero Urban Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Linei Urban Clínica de Diagnóstico Avançado por Imagem
  • Ana Paula Martins Sebastião Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Rubens Lima Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Flavia Kuroda Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Cleverton Spautz Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Thiago Astorga Martins Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Iris Rabinovich Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças
  • Eduardo Schunemann Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças

Keywords:

Breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging, surgery

Abstract

Objective: There is no data about magnetic resonance image (MRI) impact in oncoplastic surgery (OP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of MRI on the surgical planning and the changes of conduct in patients with initial breast cancer and candidates to perform the OP. Methods: This is a prospective cohort of 60 patients who were candidates to OP between January 2013 and July 2014. All of them underwent to a preoperative MRI, in addition to mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US). Any additional tumor in the MRI classified as BIRADS 4-5 were biopsied or marked with carbon and radiotracer in order to be localized during the surgery. Surgical impact of additional MRI findings were evaluated as to changes of approach to mastectomy or to wider resection. Results: Of the patients, 29/60 (48.3%) had additional findings on MRI, 16/29 (55%) were multifocal tumors, 1/29 (3.4%) was multicentric, 5/29 (17%) were contralateral tumors, and 9/29 (31%) presented tumor size larger than 10 mm in the MRI. Of 22 patients who showed additional lesions on MRI, 15 (68.2%) had invasive carcinomas in the definitive anatomopathological exam. Sensibility of MRI was higher in the estimation of the tumor size. Of the patients, 12/60 (20%) underwent to mastectomy, and 17/60 (28.3%) to wider resections. Only 5% of patients had positive margins in the entire group, and in the group of patients that had additional findings on MRI only 3.4% had positive margins. Conclusions: MRI is better than MG and US in evaluating the extension of the tumor, and in the detection of multicentricity, multifocality and bilaterality. In consequence, it contributed in this series for a better surgical planning in OP with a low rate of compromised margins and re-operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227-32.

Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(8):567-75.

Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.

McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307(5):467-75.

Urban C, Lima R, Schunemann E, Spautz C, Rabinovich I, Anselmi K. Oncoplastic principles in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2011;20(Suppl 3):S92-5.

Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, Morakkabati-Spitz N, Wardelmann E, Fimmers R, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8469-76.

Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(5):427-37.

Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, Arand B, Bieling H, Konig R, et al. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(9):1450-7.

Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213(3):881-8.

Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, Thickman D, Hylton N, Warner E, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103(9):1898-905.

Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von Heyden D, Funke M, Liersch T. The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(10):1725-31.

Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T, Bult P, Barentsz JO, Gilhuijs KG, et al. The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(2):415-22.

Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563-71.

Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, Storm RK, Plaisier PW, van Dalen T, et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(6):879-86.

Kuhl C, Kuhn W, Braun M, Schild H. Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? Breast. 2007;16(Suppl 2):S34-44.

Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75-89.

Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(8):1296-316.

Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):180-7; quiz 294-5.

Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Muller SH, Wesseling J, Peterse JL, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breastconserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116(1):161-9.

Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L, Van Der Auwera JC, Weyler J, Verslegers I, et al. MR mammography in the preoperative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(5):809-16.

Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and metaanalysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248-58.

Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(4):1149-57

Plana MN, Carreira C, Muriel A, Chiva M, Abraira V, Emparanza JI, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(1):26-38.

Lim HI, Choi JH, Yang JH, Han BK, Lee JE, Lee SK, et al. Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(1):163-7.

Gurdal SO, Ozcinar B, Kayahan M, Igci A, Tunaci M, Ozmen V, et al. Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning. Surg Today. 2013;43(1):55-61.

Fan XC, Nemoto T, Blatto K, Mangiafesto E, Sundberg J, Chen A, et al. Impact of presurgical breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on surgical planning - a retrospective analysis from a private radiology group. Breast J. 2013;19(2):134-41.

Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(13):1295-303.

Killelea BK, Long JB, Chagpar AB, Ma X, Soulos PR, Ross JS, et al. Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(1):155-63.

Miller BT, Abbott AM, Tuttle TM. The influence of preoperative MRI on breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):536-40.

Schell AM, Rosenkranz K, Lewis PJ. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):1438-44.

Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(5):290-302.

Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):249-55.

Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, Turnbull LW, McCready DR, Tuttle TM, et al. An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5):392-401.

Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082-8.

Morrow M, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer--bigger is notbetter. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):79-82.

Graphpad Prism for Windows. GraphPad Software. San Diego, California, USA. [cited 2014 May 23]. Available from: http://www.graphpad.com

Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 5. ed. USA: Prentice Hall;2009.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-02

How to Cite

Anselmi, K. F., Urban, C., Urban, L., Sebastião, A. P. M., Lima, R., Kuroda, F., … Schunemann, E. (2017). IMPACT OF PREOPERATORY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN ONCOPLASTIC SURGERY. Mastology, 27(3), 187–193. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/495

Issue

Section

Original Articles