ONCOPLASTIC TRAINING IN THE UK AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE
Downloads
References
Association of Breast Surgery at BASO, Association of Breast Surgery at BAPRAS, Training Interface Group in Breast Surgery, Baildam A, Bishop H, Boland G, et al. Oncoplastic breast surgery- a guide to good practice. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(Suppl.1):S1-23.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Clinical Guideline 80- early and advanced breast cancer [Internet]. 2009 [cited on Oct 23, 2017]. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/cg80
Rainsbury R, Browne J. Specialisation in breast surgery: opinions of the UK higher surgical trainee. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(Suppl):S298-301.
National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit [Internet]. 2011 [cited on Oct 23, 2017]. Available from: http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB02731/clin-audi-suppprog-mast-brea-reco-2011-ep1.pdf
Rainsbury D, Willett A. Oncoplastic breast reconstruction. Guidelines for best practice [Internet]. 2012 [cited on Oct 23, 2017]. Available from: http://associationofbreastsurgery. org.uk/media/1424/oncoplastic-breast-reconstructionguidelines-for-best-practice.pdf
Jeevan R, Mennie J, Mohanna P, O’Donoghue JM, Rainsbury RM, Cromwell DA. National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10161
Down S, Pereira J, Leinster S. 256541 - The specialist clinical masters qualification in oncoplastic breast surgery: A globally accessible degree supporting clinical excellence. Proceedings Annals Surg Oncol. 2017.
Blamey R, Cataliotti L. The requirements of a specialist breast unit. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:2288-93.
Cataliotti L, De Wolf C, Holland R, Marotti L, Perry N, Redmond K, et al. Guidelines on the standards for the training of specialised health professionals dealing with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:660-75.
Wilson A, Marotti L, Bianchi S, Biganzoli L, Claassen S, Decker T, et al. The requirements of a specialist breast centre. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:3579-87.
European Union of Medical Specialists. Division of Breast Surgery of the Section of Surgery and European Board of Surgery [Internet]. 2014 [cited on Oct 23, 2017]. Available from: www.uemssurg.org/divisions/breast-surgery
The Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme [Internet]. 2016 [cited on Oct 23, 2017]. Available from: www.iscp.ac.uk/
Mennie J, Mohanna P-N, O’Donoghue J, Rainsbury R, Cromwell D. National trends in immediate and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction procedures in England: a seven-year population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:52-61.
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic Surgery Statistics [Internet]. 2016 [cited on Oct 23, 2017]. Available from: www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics
Albornoz C, Bach P, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, et al. A paradigm shift in US breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15-23.
Clough K, O’Donoghue J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: 1. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1702-9.
Pusic A, Matros E, Fine N, Buchel E, Gordillo GM, Hamill JB, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2499-506.
Atisha D, Rushing C, Samsa G, Locklear TD, Cox CE, Shelley Hwang E, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:361-9.
Odofin O, Harris K, Paramanathan N, Laws S, Rainsbury R. The impact of providing an oncoplastic service on the workload of a specialist unit. Breast J. 2011;17:371-6.
Potter S, Brigic A, Whiting P, Cawthorn SJ, Avery KN, Donovan JL, et al. Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:31-46.
Mennie J, Mohanna P-N, O’Donoghue J, Rainsbury R, Cromwell D. Rates of secondary surgery following immediate postmastectomy reconstruction in the English NHS hospitals: a national cohort study of 13,736 women. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:S2-3.
Potter S, Conroy E, Williamson P, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Skillman JM, et al. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction) study. Protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction. Pilot Feasibility Studies. 2016;2:41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Richard Rainsbury
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.