IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES FOR THE GUIDELINES FOR THE EARLY DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER IN BRAZIL
Keywords:
early detection of cancer, breast neoplasms, public health policyAbstract
This research project aimed to identify strategies for implementing guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. Regarding the specific objectives, it aimed to identify studies in the specialized literature on the difficulties and strategies for implementing the guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in the health systems of different countries; to evaluate the applicability of the results found in the Brazilian context; and to recommend priority actions in accordance with the implementation strategies of the guidelines to the organizations responsible for these processes in the public health context. A review of systematic reviews was carried out using the supporting policy relevant reviews and trial (SUPPORT) tools to assist in structuring searches and analyzing data. The databases used were PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library (VHL)/Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (Lilacs) and Embase from January 1, 2008 to May 1, 2018. The study of nine selected systematic reviews identified successful actions in developed and developing countries. The strategies identified were: promotion of leadership fronts committed to the implementation of the guidelines, better governance of health services close to the target audience, national mass dissemination campaign and patient navigation program.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Report. Genebra: WHO; 2014.
Liedke PE, Finkelstein DM, Szymonifka J, Barrios CH, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Bines J, et al. Outcomes of breast cancer in Brazil related to health care coverage: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(1):126-33. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0693
Guerra MR, Silva GA, Nogueira MC, Leite IC, Oliveira RV, Cintra JR, et al. Breast cancer survival and health iniquities. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(8):1673-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00145214
Soares PB, Quirino Filho S, de Souza WP, Goncalves RC, Martelli DR, Silveira MF, et al. Characteristics of women with breast cancer seen at reference services in the North of Minas Gerais. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012;15(3):595-604.
Balabram D, Turra CM, Gobbi H. Survival of patients with operable breast cancer (stages I-III) at a Brazilian public hospital: A closer look into cause-specific mortality. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:434. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-434
Silva RCF. Evidencias cientificas e analise comparada de programas de rastreamento: elementos para a discussao de pre-requisitos ao rastreamento organizado de cancer de mama no Brasil [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Nacional de Saude Publica Sergio Arouca; 2012.
Peixoto JE. A trajetoria da mamografia – a procura da qualidade [palestra]. In: Projeto Historia do Cancer – atores, cenarios e politicas publicas. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2012.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. v. 7.
Teixeira LA, Porto MA, Noronha CP. O Cancer no Brasil: passado e presente. Rio de Janeiro: Outras Letras/FAPERJ; 2012.
Instituto Nacional de Cancer Jose Alencar Gomes da Silva. Diretrizes para a deteccao precoce do cancer de mama no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2015.
Fretheim A, Munabi-Babigumira S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S. SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Supl. 1):S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S6
Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, Grimshaw J, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 5. Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Supl. 1):S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S5
Silva V, Grande AJ, Martimbianco AL, Riera R, Carvalho AP. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom? Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(6):398-404. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802012000600007
Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Melillo S, et al. Client-Directed Interventions to Increase Community Demand for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(1 Supl.):S34-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.002
Baron RC, Rimer BK, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Kalra GP, Melillo S, et al. Client-Directed Interventions to Increase Community Access to Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(1 Supl.):S56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.001
Bowser D, Marqusee H, El Koussa M, Atun R. Health system barriers and enablers to early access to breast cancer screening, detection, and diagnosis: a global analysis applied to the MENA region. Public Health. 2017;152:58-74. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.020
Lu M, Moritz S, Lorenzetti D, Sykes L, Straus S, Quan H. A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:413. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-413
Peterson EB, Ostroff, JS, DuHamel KN, D’Agostino TA, Hernandez M, Canzona MR, et al. Impact of providerpatient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2016;93:96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034
Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, Mercer SL, Wilson KM, DeVinney B, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for The Guide to Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):97-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009
Spadea T, Bellini S, Kunst A, Stirbu I, Costa G. The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review. Prev Med. 2010;50(4):159-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.01.007
Community Preventive Services Task Force. Cancer Screening: Multicomponent Interventions—Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2016 [acessado em 6 mar. 2017]. Disponivel em: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/cancer-screeningmulticomponent-interventions-breast-cancer
Uy C, Lopez J, Trinh-Shevrin C, Kwon SC, Sherman SE, Liang PS. Text Messaging Interventions on Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e296. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7893
Ohl IC, Ohl RI, Chavaglia SR, Goldman RE. Public actions for control of breast cancer in Brazil: integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(4):746-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2016690424i
Harford J, Azavedo E, Fischietto M. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: breast healthcare program resource allocation. Cancer. 2008;113(8 Supl.):2282-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23841
Bukowski A, Gioia S, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Soto-Perez-de- Celis E, St Louis J, Paulino E, et al. Patient Navigation to Improve Access to Breast Cancer Care in Brazil. J Glob Oncol. 2016;3(5):433-437. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.006726
Gioia S. Why is breast cancer early detection important? Mastology. 2017;27(3):173-5. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z259453942017EDIT273
Hone T, Rasella D, Barreto M, Atun R, Majeed A, Millett C. Large reductions in amenable mortality associated with Brazil’s primary care expansion and strong health governance. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(1):149-58. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0966
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Sandra Marques Silva Gioia, Silvio Fernandes da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
