POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF NONPALPABLE BREAST LESIONS ACCORDING TO BI-RADS® CLASSIFICATION

Authors

  • Mônica Silva Costa Janson Ney Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias
  • Aline Vargas Goroni Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias
  • Giuliana Vasconcelos de Souza Fonseca Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias

Keywords:

Breast cancer, mammography, stereotaxic biopsy, histopathological diagnosis, BI-RADS

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the neoplasm that most affects women in Brazil and the world, and its incidence has increased steadily over the last decade. Due to screening mammography programs, according to age group, the mortality rate of breast cancer has decreased by 31%. With the increase in the number of screening examinations, there has also been increase in the number of suspicious lesions diagnosed and, consequently, increase in the indication and performance of breast biopsies. With the help of the categorizations that the American College of Radiology published, according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), it was possible to standardize the reports and descriptions of breast lesions, both in mammography and ultrasound, facilitating decision-making in regard to suspicious lesions. Objective: To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of nonpalpable breast lesions biopsied in the Radiodiagnostic Service of Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias. Method: A retrospective and analytical study of 88 patients submitted to stereotaxic guided mammary biopsies from December 2015 to December 2016 with suspected diagnosis of malignant lesions, classified by mammographic BI-RADS in categories 4 and 5 and later correlation with the histopathological reports. Results: PPV was high for category 5 lesions, and for category 4 lesions PPV was low and progressively increased with the subcategories. Conclusion: BI‑RADS categorization is an effective predictor for the risk of malignancy in suspicious mammographic lesions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Gomes de Alencar. Estimativa 2012: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Gomes de Alencar; 2011.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Gomes de Alencar. Estimativa 2016: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Gomes de Alencar; 2015.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Gomes de Alencar. Diretrizes para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Gomes de Alencar, 2015.

Badan G, Roveda Júnior D, Ferreira C, Ferreira F, Fleury E, Campos M, et al. Positive predictive values of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5 in breast lesions submitted to percutaneous biopsy. Radiol Bras. 2013;46(4):209-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400006

American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). 5ª ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013.

Kestelman F, Souza G, Thuler L, Martins G, Freitas V, Canella E. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. Revisão sistemática da literatura. Radiol Bras. 2007;40(3):173-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842007000300008

Lippi VG, Silva TLN, Sacco AC, Venys GL, Lima MCN, Ciantelli GL, et al. Correlação radiológica e histológica utilizando o sistema BI-RADS: valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. Rev Fac Ciênc Méd Sorocaba. 2014;16(1):4-10.

Bérubé M, Curpen B, Ugolini P, Lalonde L, Quimet- Oliva D. Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BIRADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1998;49:223-8.

Prado G, Guerra M. Valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). Radiol Bras. 2010;43(3):171-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842010000300008

Ciatto S, Cataliotti L, Distante V. Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. Radiology. 1987;165(1):99-102. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.1.3628796

Zonderland H, Pope T, Nieborg A. The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2373-6

Hall F, Storella J, Silverstone D, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology. 1988;167(2):353-8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.167.2.3282256

Lacquement M, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth A. Positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system11. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189(1):34-40.

Orel S, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan D. BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy. Radiology. 1999;211(3):845-50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn31845

Liberman L, Abramson A, Squires F, Glassman J, Morris E, Dershaw D. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):35‑40. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648759

Kestelman, F.P.; Canella, E.O.; Arvellos, A.N. Classificação Radiológica nas Lesões Não Palpáveis da Mama - Análise de Resultados do Instituto Nacional de Câncer. In: XXX Congresso Brasileiro de Radiologia, VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Ultra-Sonografia e X Jornada Paranaense de Radiologia, 2001, Curitiba. Anais do XXX Congresso Brasileiro de Radiologia, VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Ultra-Sonografia e X Jornada Paranaense de Radiologia, 2001.

Ball CG, Butchart M, MacFarlane JK. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. Can J Surg. 2002;45:259-63.

Tan Y, Wee S, Tan M, Chong B. Positive Predictive Value of BIRADS Categorization in an Asian Population. Asian J Surg. 2004;27(3):186-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60030-0

Tate PS, Rogers EL, McGee EM, Page GV, Hopkins SF, Shearer RG, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: a six-year surgical experience. J Ky Med Assoc. 2001;99:98-103.

Margolin F, Leung J, Jacobs R, Denny S. Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy. AJR. 2001;177(3):559-64. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770559

Travade A, Isnard A, Bagard C, Bouchet F, Chouzet S, Gaillot A, et al. Macrobiopsies stéréotaxiques par système à aspiration

-G: à propos de 249 patientes. J Radiol. 2002;83(9):1063-71. https://doi.org/JR-09-2002-83-9-C1-0221-0363-ART6

Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Ann Oncol. 2004;15(3):450-4.

Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK. Diseases of the breast. 4ª ed. Filadélfia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p.193-205.

Ernst M, Avenarius J, Schuur K, Roukema J. Wire localization of non-palpable breast lesions: out of date? Breast. 2002;11(5):408‑13. https://doi.org/10.1054/brst.2002.0444

Downloads

Published

2018-10-28

How to Cite

Ney, M. S. C. J., Goroni, A. V., & Fonseca, G. V. de S. (2018). POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF NONPALPABLE BREAST LESIONS ACCORDING TO BI-RADS® CLASSIFICATION. Mastology, 28(4), 219–224. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/920

Issue

Section

Original Articles