Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy in a patient over 50 years of age

case report with an emphasis on the psychological aspect in the face of serious complications

Authors

Keywords:

Mutation, Genes, BRCA1, Breast neoplasms, Prophylactic mastectomy, Salpingo-oophorectomy, Middle aged

Abstract

Malignant breast neoplasia is the main cause of cancer mortality in women in Brazil, after non-melanoma skin cancer, and about 5 to 10% of these cases are associated with family inheritance; BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most frequently mutated. In this sense, there has been a paradigm shift in medical practice regarding breast cancers in recent years, with the implementation of risk-reducing surgical procedures, such as bilateral mastectomy and salpingo-oopherectomy, which still have controversies in the indication, in addition to fears and sufferings of patients, before and after the procedure. A 54-year-old female patient has been undergoing routine examinations since 2009 (49 years), as she has a family history of breast cancer. In May 2014 (54 years old), the patient underwent genetic research, discovering the pathogenic 648delT mutation in heterozygosity in the BRCA1 gene. Although complementary exams did not indicate any neoplasia, the patient wanted to undergo risk-reducing surgery. After interprofessional discussion with the patient, bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy were performed. The patient had a postoperative infection, and one of the silicone prostheses was removed from her breast. In 2015 (55 years old), she underwent a new prosthesis inclusion, evolving without complications. Currently, she is being followed up and without evidence of active cancer disease. Despite the complication with the prosthesis, there was an improvement in psychological aspects that bothered her, referring to a reduction in anxiety and fear of cancer. Although beneficial, risk-reducing mastectomy has associated risks, especially in patients with advanced age and comorbidities. However, with an appropriate approach and focused on the complexities of each person, it is possible to provide the patient with a better overall psychological experience, as demonstrated in this case reported.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brazil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Saúde; 2019 [accessed on Mar 16, 2020]. Available on: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/estimativa-2020-incidencia-de-cancer-no-brasil.pdf

Amendola LCB, Vieira R. A contribuição dos genes BRCA na predisposição hereditária ao câncer de mama. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2005;51(4):325-30.

Coelho AS, Santos MAS, Caetano RI, Piovesan CF, Fiuza LA, Machado RLD, et al. Predisposição hereditária ao câncer de mama e sua relação com os genes BRCA1 e BRCA2: revisão da literatura. RBAC. 2018;50(1):17-21. http://doi.org/10.21877/2448-3877.201800615

Cabello C. Histerectomia durante a salpingoooforectomia redutora de risco em mulheres com mutações deletérias nos genes brca1 ou brca2. Indicar ou não? Rev Bras Mastologia. 2017;27(1):1-2. http://doi.org/10.5327/Z201700010001RBM

Almeida RA. Impacto da mastectomia na vida da mulher. Rev SBPH. 2006;9(2):99-113.

Cesnik VM, Santos MA. Mastectomia e sexualidade: uma revisão integrativa. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2012;25(2):339-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000200016

Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Van’t Veer L, Garber JE, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1055-62. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.04.188

Monteiro GA, Novaes JR, Carvalho Júnior JD, Rio JA, Ribeiro LLS, Silva LP, et al. O dilema da decisão de Mastectomia Bilateral como prevenção do Câncer de Mama: aspectos éticos e bioéticos. Revista Bioethikos - Centro Universitário São Camilo. 2011;5(4):443-50.

Cowen D, Gross E, Rouannet P, Teissier E, Ellis S, Resbeut M, et al. Immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy: risk factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;121(3):627-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0791-5

Ludwig KK, Neuner J, Butler A, Geurts JL, Kong AL. Risk reduction and survival benefit of prophylactic surgery

in BRCA mutation carriers, a systematic review. The Am J Surg. 2016;212(4):660-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.010

Giannakeas V, Narod SA. The expected benefit of preventive mastectomy on breast cancer incidence and mortality in BRCA mutation carriers, by age at mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(1):263-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4476-1

Downloads

Published

2020-04-12

How to Cite

Costa, R. E. A. R. da, Falcão, J. V. C. L., Bruno, L. C., Fortes, M. M., Araújo, A. L. N., & Marcos, H. S. (2020). Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy in a patient over 50 years of age: case report with an emphasis on the psychological aspect in the face of serious complications. Mastology, 30, 1–4. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/959

Issue

Section

Case Reports