Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast

consensus Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Mastology

Authors

  • Cicero de Andrade Urban Universidade Positivo
  • Ruffo Freitas Junior Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás
  • Régis Resende Paulinelli Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás
  • Gustavo Zucca Matthes Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
  • Jorge Villanova Biazús Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Fabricio Palermo Brenelli Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Douglas de Miranda Pires Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
  • André Vallejo da Silva Universidade Federal Fluminense
  • Mauricio de Aquino Resende Universidade Federal de Sergipe
  • Clécio Ênio Murta de Lucena Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
  • Elvis Barbosa Hospital Geral de Fortaleza
  • Carlos Alberto Ruiz Universidade de São Paulo
  • Rubens Murilo de Athayde Prudêncio Hospital e Maternidade São Cristóvão
  • Vilmar Marques de Oliveira Santa Casa de São Paulo
  • Rodrigo Villaverde Universidade Positivo

Keywords:

Breast neoplasms, Breast Cancer, Breast reconstruction, Conasensus, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: Despite the large number of publications in oncoplastic and breast reconstructive surgery, several issues remain controversial. The aim of this Consensus Meeting was to develop a practical guide of recommendations based on the best evidence in the literature. Method: All panelists were members of the Oncoplastic Commission of the Brazilian Society of Mastology. The Consensus Meeting was held in Bento Gonçalves (RS), in August 2015. Each panelist received and answered a questionnaire with 46 items, based on the best evidence in the literature and in their expertise. It was considered consensus the agreement of 75% between panelists. Results: There was consensus on 25 items, of which eight were for 100% agreement. The most important of these topics were: involvement of the margins in oncoplastic surgery can be solved by resection of margins in most cases; multifocal tumors is not a contraindication for oncoplastic surgery; age >70 years is not a contraindication for use of oncoplastic techniques; immediate reconstruction can be performed safely to most candidates for mastectomy; patients for post-mastectomy radiotherapy may be subject to immediate reconstruction and should be aware of the risks for poor aesthetic result; mastectomy with preservation of the nipple and areola complex is safe in cancer; radiotherapy after mastectomy with preservation of the nipple and areola complex is not indicated outside the classical criteria of irradiation chest wall; abdominal mash reduces chances of hernia in TRAM flaps. Conclusion: In this meeting it was possible to establish important consensus points according to the opinion of experts, which can help breast surgeons in their decision-making in oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cicero de Andrade Urban, Universidade Positivo

Unidade de Mama do Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças; Curso de Medicina e Programa de Pós graduação em Biotecnologia da Universidade Positivo – Curitiba (PR), Brasil.

Ruffo Freitas Junior, Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás

Serviço de Ginecologia e Mama do Hospital Araújo Jorge da Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás – Goiânia (GO), Brasil.

Régis Resende Paulinelli, Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás

Serviço de Ginecologia e Mama do Hospital Araújo Jorge da Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás – Goiânia (GO), Brasil.

Gustavo Zucca Matthes, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

Unidade de Mama do Hospital de Câncer de Barretos – Barretos (SP), Brasil

Jorge Villanova Biazús, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) – Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.

Fabricio Palermo Brenelli, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Divisão de Oncologia Mamária do Departamento de Tocoginecologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) – Campinas (SP); Centro Oncológico Antônio Ermínio de Moraes, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Douglas de Miranda Pires, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte

Clínica de Mastologia da Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte – Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

André Vallejo da Silva, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Serviço de Mastologia da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) – Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.

Mauricio de Aquino Resende, Universidade Federal de Sergipe

Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) – Aracajú (SE), Brasil.

Clécio Ênio Murta de Lucena, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte

Clínica de Mastologia da Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte – Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

Elvis Barbosa, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza

Hospital Geral de Fortaleza – Fortaleza (CE), Brasil

Carlos Alberto Ruiz, Universidade de São Paulo

Clínica Ginecológica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (USP) – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Rubens Murilo de Athayde Prudêncio, Hospital e Maternidade São Cristóvão

Hospital e Maternidade São Cristóvão – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Vilmar Marques de Oliveira, Santa Casa de São Paulo

Santa Casa de São Paulo – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Rodrigo Villaverde, Universidade Positivo

Programa de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia da Universidade Positivo – Curitiba (PR), Brasil.

Published

2015-10-25

How to Cite

Urban, C. de A., Freitas Junior, R., Paulinelli, R. R., Matthes, G. Z., Biazús, J. V., Brenelli, F. P., … Villaverde, R. (2015). Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast: consensus Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Mastology. Revista Brasileira De Mastologia, 25(4), 118–124. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/rbm/article/view/190

Issue

Section

Original Article