Comparison of three mathematical models for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node

Authors

  • Helenice Gobbi Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Henrique Silva Bartels Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Solange Maria Torchia Carvalho Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osório Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Vanessa Fortes Zschaber Marinho Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Fernando Augusto Soares Hospital Barão de Lucena

Keywords:

Neoplasms, Breast, Neoplasm metastasis, Sentinel

Abstract

Objective: It was to compare a “Brazilian Nomogram” developed for this study, the “Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram” and the “Stanford Online Calculator” for predicting the presence of metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes in Brazilian patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node. Methods: We included 261 patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy and submitted to complete axillary lymph node dissection in two Brazilian centers for treatment of breast cancer; 92 (35%) of these women had metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes. The “Brazilian Nomogram”, the “Nomogram from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center” and the “Stanford Online Calculator” were applied to calculate the probability of metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes. The accuracy of each model was calculated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: The “Brazilian Nomogram”, the “Nomogram from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center” and the “Stanford Online Calculator” showed AUC values of 0.694 (95%CI 0.629–0.760, p<0.0001), 0.626 (95%CI 0.555–0.697, p=0.001) and 0.619 (95%CI 0.548–0.689, p=0.002), respectively. Conclusions: All three models showed a reasonable discrimination in predicting metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer in this study. The “Brazilian Nomogram” had the best accuracy among the models tested, but needs to be validated in population groups different from those used in its construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Helenice Gobbi, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

PHD, Departamento de Anatomia Patológica da Faculdade UFMG – Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

Henrique Silva Bartels, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

MD, Departamento de Anatomia Patológica da Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG – Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

Solange Maria Torchia Carvalho, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

PHD, Departamento de Patologia do Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa do Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osório, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Departamento de Patologia do Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa do Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Vanessa Fortes Zschaber Marinho, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

PHD, Departamento de Anatomia Patológica da Faculdade UFMG – Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

Fernando Augusto Soares, Hospital Barão de Lucena

PHD, Departamento de Patologia do Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa do Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo – São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

Published

2011-10-10

How to Cite

Gobbi, H., Bartels, H. S., Carvalho, S. M. T., Osório, C. A. B. de T., Marinho, V. F. Z., & Soares, F. A. (2011). Comparison of three mathematical models for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node. Revista Brasileira De Mastologia, 21(4), 161–168. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/rbm/article/view/286

Issue

Section

Original Article