LOCAL RE-OPERATION AND RECURRENCE IN ONCOPLASTIC BREAST SURGERY

Authors

  • Cicero Urban Universidade Positivo
  • Vanessa Amoroso Universidade Positivo
  • Rubens Silveira de Lima Universidade Federal do Paraná

Keywords:

Mammoplasty, Local recurrence of neoplasia, Reoperation, Margins of excision, Segmental mastectomy

Abstract

Introduction: In addition to a surgical option, the oncoplastic surgery (OP) is a new philosophy in the mammary oncologic therapy, since it combines concepts of oncologic surgery and plastic surgery. There was a concern that plastic surgery techniques would compromise the oncologic radicalism, leading to an increased risk of tumor recurrence and damage to the patients’ survival. The main purpose of the breast conservative surgery (BCS) is to obtain disease-free surgical margins, with a great esthetic-functional result. However, since the advent of this approach, the search for negative margins has been a problem. Despite the efforts to avoid compromised margins, they occur in 20 to 40% of the cases in the traditional BCS, and in many cases leading to the need of reexcision or even to mastectomy. Objective and method: In the analysis of recent studies, the OP role as a reduction factor of new surgeries and local recurrence is questioned. The aim of this paper is to analyze it based on literature review. Conclusion: According to recent studies, the OP became a safe oncological surgical technique that improves both the esthetic result and the disease local control, decreasing the compromised margins with impact on the mitigation of new surgeries rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cicero Urban, Universidade Positivo

Unidade da Mama, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Universidade Positivo

Rubens Silveira de Lima, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Unidade da Mama, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças Department of Tocogynecology, Universidade Federal do Paraná

References

Urban C, Anselmi KF, Kuroda F, Schwarz J-C, Schwartz J-C. Oncoplasty as the Standard of Care in Breast Cancer Surgery. Cit Eur Oncol Haematol. 2014;10(1):43-7.

Kaviani A, Sodagari N, Sheikhbahaei S, Eslami V, Hafezi-Nejad N, Safavi A, et al. From Radical Mastectomy to Breast-Conserving Therapy and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Narrative Review Comparing Oncological Result, Cosmetic Outcome, Quality of Life, and Health Economy. ISRN Oncol. 2013;2013:742462.

Urban C, Lima R, Schunemann E, Spautz C, Rabinovich I, Anselmi K. Oncoplastic principles in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2011;20(Suppl. 3):92-5.

Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda E, Pellarin L, Filassi JR, Piato JR, et al. Assessment of immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction: A classification system of defects revisited and an algorithm for selecting the appropriate technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(3):716-27.

Rancati A, Gonzalez E, Dorr J, Angrigiani C, Gercovich G. Oncoplastic surgery in the treatment of breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7(1):293.

Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, Mazzarol G, Maisonneuve P, Garusi C, et al. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast. 2007;16(4):387-95.

Schaverien MV, Raine C, Majdak-Paredes E, Dixon JM. Therapeutic mammaplasty-Extending indications and achieving low incomplete excision rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(4):329-33.

Carter SA, Lyons GR, Kuerer HM, Bassett RL, Oates S, Thompson A, et al. Operative and Oncologic Outcomes in 9861 Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis of Breast Conservation with Oncoplastic Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3190-8.

De Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, Geha R, Nocera N, Czerniecki BJ, et al. Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3247-58.

De Lorenzi F, Loschi P, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, Hubner G, Mazzarol G, et al. Oncoplastic Breast-conserving Surgery for Tumors Larger than 2 Centimeters: Is it Oncologically Safe? A Matched-Cohort Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6):1852-9.

Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, Wenkel E, Magener A, Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(1):32-7.

Kaviani A, Safavi A, Mohammadzadeh N, Jamei K, Ansari-Damavandi M, Salmon RJ. Clinical Science: Oncoplastic surgery in breast conservation: a prospective evaluation of the patients, techniques, and oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg. 2014;208:727-34.

Rezai M, Kellersmann S, Knispel S, Lax H, Kimmig R, Kern P. Translating the concept of intrinsic subtypes into an oncoplastic cohort of more than 1000 patients – predictors of recurrence and survival. Breast. 2015;24(4):384-90.

Kell MR, Morrow M. An adequate margin of excision in ductal carcinoma in situ. BMJ. 2005;331(7520):789-90.

Zee KJ Van, Subhedar P, Olcese C, Patil S, Morrow M. Relationship Between Margin Width and Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 2996 Women Treated With Breast-conserving Surgery for 30 Years. Ann Surg. 2015;262(4):623-31.

Szynglarewicz B, Maciejczyk A, Forgacz J, Matkowski R. Breast segmentectomy with rotation mammoplasty as an oncoplastic approach to extensive ductal carcinoma in situ. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:72.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-02

How to Cite

Urban, C., Amoroso, V., & Lima, R. S. de. (2017). LOCAL RE-OPERATION AND RECURRENCE IN ONCOPLASTIC BREAST SURGERY. Mastology, 27(3), 176–181. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/508

Issue

Section

Original Articles