DIFFICULTIES IN COLLECTING DATA ON DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU AT A POPULATION-BASED CANCER REGISTRY

Authors

Keywords:

DCIS, epidemiology, breast neoplasms, carcinoma in situ, carcinoma, intraductal, noninfiltrating, DCISepidemiologia, neoplasias da mama, carcinoma in situcarcinoma intraductal não infiltrante

Abstract

Objective: To verify data-coding accuracy for ductal carcinoma in situ at the Goiânia population-based cancer registry in the Brazilian state of Goiás. Methods: Ecological time series analysis of cases coded as ductal carcinoma in situ in the state cancer database (ONCOSIS), considering data from the Goiânia population-based cancer registry, from 1994 to 2010. Results: Of 376 cases originally coded as ductal carcinoma in situ, 115 were excluded following a review of the pathology reports. These exclusions referred to cases of lobular carcinoma in situ (n=21), Paget’s disease (n=4), invasive carcinoma (n=08), ductal carcinoma in situ associated with invasive carcinoma (n=14), microinvasive carcinoma (n=21), records on non-residents in Goiânia, and duplicated data (n=46). Conclusion: Many cases needed recoding and, as a consequence, altered the initial database. Standardizing pathology reports and training data collection staff are crucial steps to avoid omissions and errors when transcribing cases of ductal carcinoma in situ in a population-based cancer registry database.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nayara Alves de Freitas Lemos, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Post-graduate Student in Health Science, Health Science Post-graduate Program, Medical College, Universidade Federal de Goiás

References

Salles MA, Matias MA, Resende LM, Gobbi H. Interobserver variation of the histopathologic diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(1):1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032005000100002

Salles MA, Matias MA, Soares PC, Resende LM, Gobbi H. Current approach of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Femina. 2007;35(1):19-27.

Wachter DL, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A. Ductal carcinoma in situ - do we really need a new nomenclature? Onkologie. 2009;32(4):158. https://doi.org/10.1159/000208516

Gobbi H. Classification of tumours of the breast: an update based on the new 2012 World Health Organization Classification. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2012;48(6):463-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1676-24442012000600013

International Agency of Research on Cancer. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications [Internet]; 1992 [cited on June 20, 2015]. Available at: <http://www-dep.iarc.fr/>

Gebrim LH. Breast cancer screening and stage at diagnosis. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009;31(5):216-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032009000500002

Rabinovitch RA, Solin LJ, Shank BM, Haffty BG, Halberg FE, Martinez AA, et al. Carcinoma ductal in situ e doenca microinvasiva. Criterios de Adequacao do American College of Radiology. Colegio Brasileiro de Radiologia [Internet]. [cited REFERENCES on Sept. 22, 2014]. Available at: <https://cbr.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/08_02.pdf>.

Moura L, Curado MP, Simoes EJ, Cezario AC, Urdaneta M. Evaluation of the population-based cancer registry of the Municipality of Goiania, Goias State, Brazil. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2006;15(4):7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742006000400002

Kuhar CG, Matos E. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive microinvasive breast carcinoma with a highly aggressive course: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-325

Almeida OJ, Zeferino LC, Alvarenga M, Souza GA, Pinto GA, Cestari AL. Ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma in the same breast: evaluation of the nuclear grade and the expressions of proteins p53 and C-erbB-2 and estrogen receptors. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2004;26(6):435-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032004000600003

Bacchi CE, Melo CR, Franco MF, Artigiani Neto R, eds. Manual de padronizacao de laudos histopatologicos. Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia. 4 ed. Sao Paulo: Minha Editora; 2014:309-316.

Mesurolle B, Perez JC, Azzumea F, Lemercier E, Xie X, Aldis A, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1389-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10864

Downloads

Published

2019-04-05

How to Cite

Freitas-Junior, R., Lemos, N. A. de F., Moreira, M. A. R., Silva, T. C., Oliveira, J. C. de, & Silva, C. M. B. e. (2019). DIFFICULTIES IN COLLECTING DATA ON DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU AT A POPULATION-BASED CANCER REGISTRY. Mastology, 29(2), 86–89. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/582

Issue

Section

Original Articles