HOW MUCH CAN WE TRUST ON THE SELFREPORTED COLOR WHEN EVALUATING BREAST CANCER ANCESTRY

Authors

  • René Aloisio da Costa Vieira Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”
  • Débora Sant’Anna de Andrade e Silva Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
  • Ana Carolina Laus Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
  • Carlos Eduardo Bacchi Universidade do Porto
  • René Julias Costa e Silva Universidade do Porto
  • Idam de Oliveira-Junior Hospital de Câncer de Barretos
  • Rui Pereira Universidade do Porto
  • Rui Manuel Vieira Reis Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

Keywords:

Breast Cancer, Epidemiology, Genetic Variation, Molecular Pathology, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between self-reported color and ancestry in Brazilian patients with breast cancer (BC). Methods: Ethics approval 1136/2016. This was an observational, transversal, epidemiological study, evaluating 1,215 patients with BC. DNA was extracted to evaluate ancestry. For genetic ancestry, a 46 AIM-INDEL panel was used, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were subjected to capillary electrophoresis. The ancestral profile was evaluated with Structure v.2.3.3 software, for ancestry proportion, the percentages of ancestry in the different self-referred colors. For this purpose, descriptive statistics was performed (mean ± standard deviation [minimum − maximum]). To assess differences between groups, ANOVA and Bonferroni were used. Results: The color distribution was 77.9% (946) white, 17.4% (212) brown, 4.1% (50) black, 0.3% (4) yellow, and 0.2% (3) mixed. Genetically, the African ancestry proportion was significantly (p<0.001), more evident in blacks (0.63±0.21 [0.17–0.96]), followed by browns (0.25±0.16 [0.02–0.70]), and less frequent in white skin color. The European ancestry proportion was significantly (p<0.001) higher in whites (0.7±0.17 [0.02–0.97]), followed by browns (0.57±0.19 [0.12–0.92]), yellow (0.27±0.31 [0.12–0.620]), and black (0.24 ± 0.19 [0.02–0.72]). The Asiatic ancestry proportion was significantly (p<0.001) higher in yellow (0.48 ± 0.51 [0.04–0.93]) with less difference between the other groups. Finally, the Amerindian ancestry proportion frequency was less frequent in all groups, and cafuse patients did not express differences between all race groups. Brown race group presented differences in the African and European Ancestry. Conclusion: Although we found many similarities between white color — European ancestry, black color — African ancestry, and yellow color — Asian ancestry, there is great miscegenation between patients and although they can be labeled as having one color, they do present many ancestral genes that would allow their inclusion in another race group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

René Aloisio da Costa Vieira, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oncologia, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, rograma de Pós-Graduação em Tocoginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”

Débora Sant’Anna de Andrade e Silva, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

Centro de Pesquisa Molecular em Oncologia, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

Carlos Eduardo Bacchi, Universidade do Porto

Laboratório de Patologia Bacchi, Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular, Universidade do Porto

Downloads

Published

2021-10-14

How to Cite

Vieira, R. A. da C., Silva, D. S. de A. e, Laus, A. C., Bacchi, C. E., Silva, R. J. C. e, Oliveira-Junior, I. de, … Reis, R. M. V. (2021). HOW MUCH CAN WE TRUST ON THE SELFREPORTED COLOR WHEN EVALUATING BREAST CANCER ANCESTRY. Mastology, 31, 16. Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/988

Issue

Section

Commented Poster