Correlation between the proportion of healthy mammary tissue versus tumor size in breast-conserving surgeries
Palavras-chave:
mastectomy, segmental, margins of excision, breast neoplasms, treatment outcome, estheticsResumo
Objective: To evaluate the proportion of excised healthy tissue in breast-conserving surgeries and to identify possible tendency toward excision in healthy tissue beyond the ideal for oncological safety. Methods: Data from patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery at the Hospital Geral de Caxias do Sul from January 2010 to December 2016 were analyzed. For statistical purposes, means, standard deviations, Student’s t-test, and linear regression were used for numerical variables. Risk estimate by odds ratio (OR) was performed through logistic regression with 95% CI. A significance level (alpha) of 5% was adopted. Results: A total of 124 cases were analyzed. The mean tumor size observed by ultrasonography was 1.7 ± 0.95 cm. The tumor size was 1.9 ± 1.12 cm. The mean size of the resected surgical specimens was 7.8 ± 3.4cm. When comparing the tumor size in the anatomopathological examination and the size in ultrasonography, the mean differences accounted for 0.6 cm (95%CI -0.10–0.44; p = 0.2). Conversely, the difference in the size of the total surgical specimen versus tumor size in the anatomopathological examination was 5.8 cm (95%CI 5.2–6.5; p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference regarding the tumor location nor size of the surgical specimen. Conclusion: It was observed that there is a tendency toward excising a large amount of healthy tissue in breast-conserving surgeries far beyond what is recommended in order to consider the oncological safety of excised margins.
Downloads
Referências
Silva JME, Marinho FMB, Tonellotto F, Giola SM, Monteiro SO, Bello MA, et al. Margens cirúrgicas no tratamento conservador do câncer de mama: revisão sistemática. 2014;24(3):70-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5327/Z201400030003RBM
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativas câncer de mama. Brasil: Ministerio da Saúde; 2016.
Caxias do Sul. Secretaria Municipal da Saúde. Óbitos por Neoplasias de Residentes de Caxias do Sul. Caxias do Sul: Secretaria Municipal da Saúde; 2016.
Luini A, Gatti G, Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Intra M, Gentilini O, et al. Conservative treatment of breast cancer: its evolution. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94(3):195-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-7376-0
Halsted WSI. The Results of Radical Operations for the Cure of Carcinoma of the Breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46(1):1-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2F00000658-190707000-00001
Halsted WSI. The Results of Operations for the Cure of Cancer of the Breast Performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg. 1894;20(5):497-555. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2F00000658-189407000-00075
Fisher B. Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1977;40(1 Supl.):574-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197707)40:1+%3C574::aid-cncr2820400724%3E3.0.co;2-o
Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(8):567-75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020128
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152
Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6-11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198107023050102
Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227-32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020989
Tiezzi DG. Cirurgia conservadora no câncer de mama: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(8):428-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032007000800008
Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, Silver B, Recht A, Troyan SL, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78(9):1921-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19961101)78:9%3C1921::aid-cncr12%3E3.0.co;2-#
Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Meric F, Bucholz TA, Esnaola N, Singletary SE, et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(3):256-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02573063
Vicini FA, Kestin L, Huang R, Martinez A. Does local recurrence affect the rate of distant metastases and survival in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy? Cancer. 2003;97(4):910-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11143
Kaufmann M, Morrow M, Von Minckwitz G, Harris JR. Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Cancer. 2010;116(5):1184-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24874
Houssami N, Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician’s perspective and what the literature tells us. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(1):2-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23594
Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(3):553-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012
Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Aldeman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1375
Valero MG, Golshan M. Management of the Axilla in Early Breast Cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2018;173:39-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70197-4_4
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(12):983-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70947-0
Kim H, Cho J, Kwon SY, Kang SH. Biologic subtype is a more important prognostic factor than nodal involvement in patients with stages I and II breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;90(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.1.1
Van Bogaert, L. J. Recent progress in the histological typing of human breast tumours. Diagn Histopathol. 1981;4(4):349-53.
Gurleyik G, Karagulle H, Eris E, Aker F, Ustaalioglu BO. Oncoplastic surgery; volume displacement techniques for breast conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer. Acta Chir Belg. 2017;117(3):169-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2016.1272916
Kondov B, Isijanovska R, Milenkovikj Z, Petruveska G, Jovanovski-Srceva M, Bogdanovska-Todorovska M. et al. Impact of Size of the Tumour, Persistence of Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Receptors, HER2Neu Receptors and Ki67 Values on Positivity of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Early Breast Cancer with Clinically Negative Axillary Examination. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(7):825-30. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.213
Hieken TJ, Harrison J, Herreros J, Velasco JM. Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size. Am J Surg. 2001;182(4):351-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00726-7
Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr., et al. Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01806626
Shoma A, Moutamed A, Ameen M, Abdelwahab A. Ultrasound for accurate measurement of invasive breast cancer tumor size. Breast J. 2006;12(3):252-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00249.x
DiBiase SJ, K omarnicky LT, Schwartz GF, Xie Y, Mansfield CM. The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;82(11):2212-20.
Butler-Henderson K, Lee AH, Price RI, Waring K. Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: a systematic review. Breast. 2014;23(2):112-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.002
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriela Grando Pinson, Julianes Pacheco, Vanderlei Carlos Bertuol Júnior, Fernando Vivian
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
