Ampliação sistemática das margens cirúrgicas na cirurgia oncoplástica da mama

Autores

  • Danilo Manente Instituto de Mama de Campinas
  • Douglas de Miranda Pires Mastology Clinic, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
  • Carolina Nazareth Valadares Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
  • Raffaela Levy de Andrade Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
  • Ana Carolina Guglielmelli Mendonça Hospital Luxemburgo

Palavras-chave:

Neoplasia da mama, margens de excisão, mamoplastia

Resumo

Introdução: A cirurgia conservadora da mama tem se modificado consideravelmente nas últimas décadas. O remodelamento mamário pós-cirurgia conservadora apresenta-se como uma forma de abordagem cirúrgica com bons resultados oncológicos e cosméticos. A margem cirúrgica das cirurgias oncológicas da mama tem se mostrado um fator limitante, pois um percentual considerável das pacientes é submetido a novos procedimentos, aumentando os custos e a morbidade. Objetivo: Descrever a experiência da instituição de ampliação sistemática das margens cirúrgicas na cirurgia conservadora de mama e os benefícios dessa técnica. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, que avaliou informações contidas em prontuário de pacientes do Instituto de Mama de Campinas, entre os anos de 2009 e 2015. A ampliação sistemática das margens consiste na retirada de tecido em torno do tumor, com espessura de 1 cm e dimensões de 2 cm nos demais eixos. São avaliadas margens medial, lateral, cranial, inferior, profunda e superficial. Resultados: Em um total de 94 casos com realização de ampliação sistemática das margens cirúrgicas, foram evitadas 18 (20%) reoperações. Apenas duas pacientes necessitaram de nova cirurgia. Conclusão: Trata-se de um procedimento simples e reprodutível, que não prejudica o resultado estético final, e que visa oferecer margens cirúrgicas livres de doença, evitando a reoperação e o atraso do tratamento adjuvante.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Douglas de Miranda Pires, Mastology Clinic, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte

Mastology Clinic, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Postgraduate Course in Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa in the Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte

Carolina Nazareth Valadares, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte

Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Instituto Biocor

Referências

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002.

Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B, Luini A, Saccozzi R, Zucali R, et al. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial. Eur J Cancer. 1990.

Kaufmann M, Morrow M, von Minckwitz G, Harris JR, Biedenkopf Expert Panel Members. Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Cancer. 2010.

Meric F, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Buchholz TA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, et al. Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 2003.

Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000.

Bulstrode NW, Shrotria S. Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast. 2001.

Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surgery. 2002.

Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breastconserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:307-14.

Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer, part 2: relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:160-6.

Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, SarfatiIm. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surgery Oncol. 2010;17:1375-91.

Masetti R, Franceschini G, Magno S, Terribile D, Fabbri MC, Chiesa F, et al. Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer: an overview. Breast. 2006.

Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: Oncoplastic breast-conserving reconstruction-indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007.

Franceschini G, Magno S, Fabbri C, Chiesa F, Moschella F, Scafetta I, et al. Conservative and radical oncoplastic approches in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008.

Nahabedian M. Oncoplastic Surgery of the Breast. Saunders Elsevier, 2009.

Schwartz GF, Veronesi U, Clough KB, Dixon JM, Fentiman IS, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, et al. Proceedings of the consensus conference on breast conservation, Milan, Italy. Cancer. 2006.

Franceschini G, Terribile D, Magno S, Fabbri C, Accetta C, Di Leone A, et al. Update on oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012:1530-1540.

Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Xie XJ, Yan J, Euhus D, Peng Y, et al. Impact of routine cavity shave marginson breast cancer reexcision rates. Ann Surgery Oncol. 2011;18:1349-55.

Mook J, Klein R, Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Euhus D, Peng Y, et al. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique. Ann Surgery Oncol. 2012;19:886-91.

Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, Vang R, Tsangaris TN, Argani P. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surgery Pathol. 2005;29:1625-32.

Feron JG, Nguyen A, Bézu C, Antoine M, Darai E, Coutant C, et al. Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique. Breast. 2011;20:358-64.

Tang R, Coopey SB, Specht MC, Lei L, Gadd MA, Hughes KS, et al. Lumpectomy specimen margins are not reliable in predicting residual disease in breast conserving surgery. Am J Surgery. 2014.

Hequet D, Bricou A, Koual M, Ziol M, Feron JG, Rouzier R, et al. Systematic cavity shaving: modifications of breast cancer management and long-term local recurrence, a multicentre study. Eur J Surgery Oncol. 2013;39:899-905.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-04-06

Como Citar

Manente, D., Pires, D. de M., Valadares, C. N., Andrade, R. L. de, & Mendonça, A. C. G. (2017). Ampliação sistemática das margens cirúrgicas na cirurgia oncoplástica da mama. Mastology, 27(2), 131–134. Recuperado de https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/486

Edição

Seção

Original Articles